Why we read

A case can be made that people who read a preposterous number of books are not playing with a full deck.  I prefer to think of us as dissatisfied customers.  If you have read 6,000 books in your lifetime, or even 600, it's probably because at some level you find "reality" a bit of a disappointment.  People in the 19th century fell in love with "Ivanhoe" and "The Count of Monte Cristo" because they loathed the age they were living through.  Women in our own era read "Pride and Prejudice" and "Jane Eyre" and even "The Bridges of Madison County" -- a dimwit, hayseed reworking of "Madame Bovary" -- because they imagine how much happier they would be if their husbands did not spend quite so much time with their drunken, illiterate golf buddies down at Myrtle Beach.  A blind bigamist nobleman with a ruined castle and an insane, incinerated first wife beats those losers any day of the week.  Blind, two-timing noblemen never wear belted shorts.

....  No matter what they tell themselves, book lovers do not read primarily to obtain information or to while away the time.  They read to escape to a more exciting, more rewarding world.  A world where they do not hate their jobs, their spouses, their governments, their lives. A world where women do not constantly say things like, "Have a good one!" and "Sounds like a plan!"  A world where men do not wear belted shorts.  Certainly not the Knights Templar.

-- Joe Queenan, "One for the Books"